Page History
...
The i2b2 database loading modules come with at least 3 sets of "metadata" or ontology trees. These are the demo ontology, the ACT ontology, and the ACT-on-OMOP ontology.
That may be the "demo" ontology, but it doesn't resemble the "ACT" ontology that our PI was showing us. How many different ontology trees does i2b2 have?
The i2b2 database loading modules come with at least 3 sets of "metadata" or ontology trees. These are the demo ontology, the ACT ontology, and the ACT-on-OMOP ontology.
| Name | Description | Included Domains (I don't think all domains can be listed, or it will be hard to understand. I think this merges with description and tries to convey the level of detail and comprehensiveness). | Name | Description | Included Domains
|---|---|---|---|
| Target Data Model | |||
| i2b2 demo ontology | default metadata from i2b2 authors | fixme | i2b2 Common Data Model (star-schema); default CRC database has matching concepts |
| ACT ontology | ENACT project | fixme | i2b2 Common Data Model (star-schema); ACT CRC demo database has matching concepts |
| ACT-on-OMOP ontology | ENACT project | fixme | i2b2 Common Data Model (star-schema), but modified with views into the OMOP Common Data Model; CRC database loaded with SYNPUF demo data has matching concepts |
That may be the "demo" ontology, but it doesn't resemble the "ACT" ontology that our PI was showing us. How many different ontology trees does i2b2 have?
The i2b2 database loading modules come with at least 3 sets of "metadata" or ontology trees. These are the demo ontology, the ACT ontology, and the ACT-on-OMOP ontology.
How about a thumbnail description of these ontologies? How do they differ from each other?
Sure. Here is a table describing the major differences among them.
You just mentioned Domains. What do you mean by that?
...
