[WEBCLIENT-296] The Demographics plugin report should display descriptions (rather that codes) for demographic values Created: 18/Dec/14 Updated: 16/Mar/20 |
|
| Status: | New |
| Project: | i2b2 Web Client |
| Component/s: | None |
| Affects Version/s: | None |
| Fix Version/s: | TBD |
| Type: | Improvement | Priority: | Major |
| Reporter: | Carmen Vodislav | Assignee: | Mike Mendis |
| Resolution: | Unresolved | Votes: | 2 |
| Labels: | None | ||
| Remaining Estimate: | Not Specified | ||
| Time Spent: | Not Specified | ||
| Original Estimate: | Not Specified | ||
| Attachments: |
DemogrReport1.png
DemogrReport2.png
|
| Affects View/s: |
Analysis View
|
| i2b2 Feature/s: |
Patient Breakdowns
|
| i2b2 Sponsored Project/s: |
i2b2 Web Client
|
| Participant/s: |
| Description |
|
The Plugin viewer for Demographics within the Analysis Tools displays a demographics report in the "View Results" tab for 1 or 2 patient set(s).
The report shows the distribution of patients for different demographics categories: age, sex, race, language, religion and vital status of patients. The improvement suggested is that the demographic codes displayed in this report (M, F, white, etc.) are replaced with their actual description (Male, Female, White, etc.) The demographics values currently displayed in the report are precisely the codes used in the patient_dimension table's demographic columns. If one were to populate the language_cd column within patient_dimension with ISO codes for language, for instance, the demographics report will be difficult to read (would require a legend). |
| Comments |
| Comment by Carmen Vodislav [ 14/Jan/15 ] |
| Same applies to race and religion. See attached screenshots of the report. |
| Comment by Carmen Vodislav [ 15/Jan/15 ] |
| I would like to change this issue into a Defect, please. |
| Comment by Brant Klepel [ 23/Jan/15 ] |
| Mike, we think that this is a defect because the code lookup tables are not being used for the demographic values. Is this fix planned for a future fixpack or release yet? Thanks, Brant |